Zeritsky's Law — Key Ideas to Explore
Edition facts
The catalog record for Zeritsky's Law — Key Ideas to Explore provides practical reading context through 5,579 words, 25 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.
The text analysis averages about 22.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Science fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Zeritskys were the obvious answer to his problem.
The agreement between them has been preserved. They undertook to service the youth without advance payment. They further undertook to watch the Milwaukee papers until the demise of the uncle should be reported, whereupon they would defrost the boy. In exchange for this, the youth, thinking of course that money would be no object when he came out, agreed to pay double.
The uncle lived 17 years longer, during which time he seems to have forgotten his nephew and to have become deeply interested in a mystic society, to which he left his entire fortune. The Zeritskys duly defrosted the boy, and whether they or he were the more disappointed is impossible to imagine. They never forgot the lesson, and never made another exception to their rule.
He, poor fellow, spent the rest of his life, including the best years, paying off his debt which, at $3,000 plus 17 years at $100 per year, and the whole doubled, amounted to $9,400. The books record his slow but regular payments over the next 43 years, and indicate that he had only $250 left to pay when he died. We may, I think, assume that various underworld characters who were grateful ex-clients of the Zeritskys were instrumental in persuading the boy to keep up his payments.
Criminals were the first to apply for quick-freezing, and formed the mainstay of the Zeritskys' business through the years. What more easy than to rob, hide the loot (except for that all-important advance payment), present yourself to the Zeritskys and remain in their admirable chambers for five or ten years, emerge to find the hue and cry long since died down and the crime forgotten, recover your haul and live out your life in luxury?
Due to the shady character of most of their patrons, the Zeritskys kept all records by a system of numbers. Names never appeared on the books, and anonymity was guaranteed.
Law enforcement agents, looking for fugitives from justice, found no way to break down this system, nor any law which they could interpret as making it illegal to quick-freeze. Perhaps the truth is that they did not search too diligently for a law that could be made to apply. As long as the Zeritskys kept things quiet and did not advertise or attract public attention, they could safely continue their bizarre business.
City officials of Los Angeles, and particularly members of the police force, enjoyed a period of unparalleled prosperity. Lawyers and other experts who thought they were on the track of legal means by which to liquidate the Zeritsky empire found themselves suddenly able to buy a ranch or a yacht or both, and retire forever from the arduous task of earning a living.
Even with a goodly part of the population of Los Angeles as permanent pensioners, the Zeritsky fortune grew to incredible proportions. By the time the Zeritsky Brothers died and left the business to their sons, it was a gold mine, and an inexhaustible one at that.
During these later years, the enterprise began to attract a somewhat better class of people. Murderers and other criminals continued to furnish the bulk of the business, but as word of this amazing service seeped through the country, others began to see in it an easy way of solving their problems. They were encouraged, too, by the fact that the process was painless, and the firm completely reliable. There were no risks, no accidents, no fatalities. One could, in short, have confidence in the Zeritskys.
Soon after Monahan's great exposure rocked the nation, however, many of these better-type clients leaped into print to tell their experiences.
One of the most poignant stories came from the daughter of a Zeritsky client. Her father was still, at the age of one hundred and two, passionately interested in politics, but the chances of his lasting until the next election were not good. The daughter herself suggested the deep freeze, and he welcomed the idea. He decided on a twenty year stay because, in his own words, "If the Republicans can't get into the White House in twenty years, I give up." Upon his return, he found that his condition had not been fulfilled. His daughter described him as utterly baffled by the new world. He lived in it just a week before he left it, this time for good. She states his last words were, "How do you people stand it?"
The story opens not with a speculative leap but with a domestic mishap: a cat falls into a home deep-freeze unit. Ann Griffith grounds this premise in a specific time and place—Los Angeles, 1950—and in the mundane details of Mrs. Graham's missing pet and her subsequent faint. The voice is wry and observational, comparing the cat's historical influence to Mrs. O'Leary's cow. This initial, almost folksy tone belies the story's rapid acceleration into a chronicle of commercial cryonics, mass migration, and legislative action.
From Anecdote to Institution
The narrative voice undergoes a distinct shift after the cat's rescue. The early paragraphs dwell on the cat's behavior—its licking, its nap, its delayed hunger—with a leisurely, almost amused precision. But once the Zeritsky family enters, the pace quickens. The prose becomes compressed, summarizing the growth of a business that freezes people for future revival. The tone turns reportorial, listing effects: “People poured into the city. They continued to come, choking every available means of transport.” The language sheds its earlier whimsy and adopts the clipped urgency of a news dispatch.
The Weight of a Single Word
Griffith uses repetition and parallel structure to convey scale. The phrase “poured into the city” is followed by “choking every available means of transport,” creating a sense of overwhelming influx. The word “poured” reappears later in the excerpt, reinforcing the image of unstoppable flow. The story also relies on precise temporal markers—“six days,” “a week later,” “the next two days”—to anchor the fantastical premise in a timeline that feels factual. These details, drawn from newspaper accounts within the story, lend an air of documentary authenticity.
Congress and the Freezer
The final movement of the excerpt compresses time even further. The international situation, a draft bill, and the Zeritskys' conscription into military service are all mentioned in rapid succession. The sentence “When we consider the date, and remember that due to the gravity of the international situation, a bill had just been passed drafting all men from 16 to 60, we realize why Congress had to act” is a single, breathless clause that bundles context, motive, and consequence. The story ends not with a resolution but with a warning: the Zeritskys are put in charge of dehydrated foods and told not to get ideas. The pace, which began with a cat's slow defrosting, has accelerated to a legislative sprint.
Griffith's story is a study in narrative acceleration. It begins with a single, improbable event and traces its expansion into a social phenomenon, all while maintaining a deadpan, reportorial tone. Readers should attend to how the author uses temporal markers and shifts in sentence length to create a sense of mounting pressure. The story's brevity—under 6,000 words—belies its compressed scope, moving from a kitchen to Congress without losing its grip on the specific.
Reading about Zeritsky’s Law, I remembered the family freezer in our garage—that hum, that promise of preserved time. It reminded me of a quieter novel about a house that holds its occupants mid-thought, Yesterday House — Text and Context, where the stillness felt less like science and more like grief you could touch. Both leave me staring at ordinary places, wondering what waits, frozen.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.